-
- Google adds a “personalized music generation” feature to Gemini.
- [Google adds a “personalized music generation” feature to Gemini] Google said on Feb. 18 (local time) that it has added a personalized music creation feature to its AI assistant app, Gemini. In the desktop version of the Gemini app, the audio generation feature is now available in beta. Users can create a 30-second piece of music by entering text, images, or video. Cover art is also generated using Google’s AI image generator, Nano Banana, and lyrics can be automatically created if requested. The new function is powered by Google DeepMind’s latest generative music model, Lyria 3. It supports English, German, Spanish, French, Hindi, Japanese, Korean, and Portuguese. Source : "구글, 제미나이에 '맞춤형 음악 생성 기능' 추가", THE ELECTRONIC TIMES, 2026.02.19.
-
- 작성일 2026-02-19
- 조회수 340
-
- It’s a hot topic: “Use ChatGPT Pro for 29,000 won”… Here are the precautions for “ChatGPT for Kakao.”
- [It’s a hot topic: “Use ChatGPT Pro for 29,000 won”… Here are the precautions for “ChatGPT for Kakao.”] Kakao, in partnership with OpenAI, has launched “ChatGPT for Kakao,” drawing attention with a discounted voucher for the ChatGPT Pro service. The company has also introduced a “1+1” promotion that offers two months of access for the price of one month of ChatGPT Plus. ChatGPT Pro typically costs $200 per month (about 300,000 won). However, the new voucher is priced at 29,000 won—roughly one-tenth of the usual fee—sparking strong interest among users. According to Kakao, the voucher provides the same features as the existing Pro paid plan, enabling expert-level tasks such as complex data analysis and advanced code generation and verification. The voucher is available for purchase through the “Gift” tab in KakaoTalk. Once registered, users can access ChatGPT on both the web and mobile app versions. Existing paid subscribers (Plus/Pro) can register the voucher only after fully cancelling their current subscription. Users are advised to note the validity period. The voucher remains valid for up to 93 days, and any unregistered voucher will expire automatically once the period ends. Extensions are not available. Questions have also been raised over privacy and data training. By default, data usage and model training settings are enabled for free, Plus, and Pro accounts. Kakao said that when users log in by linking their ChatGPT account, the existing ChatGPT settings are applied as is. Those who do not want their data used must disable the setting directly in the ChatGPT web or app. Users who access the service without logging in must manually turn off the “Improve the model for everyone” option in the settings. Source : "2.9만원으로 챗GPT 프로 사용" 화제....'챗GPT 포 카카오' 유의 사항은". AI TIMES, 2026.02.13.
-
- 작성일 2026-02-19
- 조회수 340
-
- OpenAI Officially Announces Entry into Korea: Why Altman Chose Korea
- [OpenAI Officially Announces Entry into Korea: Why Altman Chose Korea] OpenAI has officially announced the launch of its Korean branch, OpenAI Korea. As the company’s twelfth office worldwide and third in Asia, the new entity aims to build a collaborative framework that bridges industry and academia, while driving a major shift and broader adoption of AI with Korea as a key hub. OpenAI explained that its decision to expand into Korea was based on the country’s world-class infrastructure, outstanding talent and companies, rapid digital adoption, and technology-friendly environment. This assessment is supported by data. ChatGPT’s weekly active users (WAU) have surpassed 700 million globally, While in Korea, WAU has increased fourfold compared to the previous year. Paid subscriptions have more than tripled, making Korea the largest market in the Asia-Pacific region, and API usage ranks within the global top ten. These figures highlight Korea’s growing importance in the global AI ecosystem. OpenAI is also strengthening this momentum through partnerships and ecosystem expansion. It has formed a strategic alliance with Kakao to enhance service integration, while major companies such as Samsung Electronics are adopting ChatGPT to boost productivity. The company has also signed a research MOU with University in KOREA, and continues to organize networking events such as developer workshops, the upcoming Founders Day on September 12, and a technology-sharing session scheduled for November. Furthermore, OpenAI has expressed interest in establishing a data center in Korea, indicating that while the timeline and scale remain undecided, the move could depend on regulatory conditions and corporate investment opportunities. Source : "한국 진출 본격 선언한 오픈AI…올트먼이 한국을 선택한 이유", MAEIL BUSINESS NEWSPAPER, 2025.09.11.
-
- 작성일 2025-09-11
- 조회수 991
-
- AI Goes from College Student to PhD… OpenAI Unveils 'GPT-5' Model
- [AI Goes from College Student to PhD… OpenAI Unveils 'GPT-5' Model] OpenAI unveiled its latest AI model, “GPT-5,” on the 7th (local time). It is a hybrid model that further advances and integrates the previous “GPT-4o” and the reasoning model “o3,” and is the first completely new model to be released in two years. Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO) described GPT-5 by saying, “If GPT-3 felt like talking to a high school student, and GPT-4 felt like talking to a college student, then GPT-5 feels like talking to a PhD-level expert,” calling it a major leap toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). OpenAI emphasized that GPT-5 is the smartest, fastest, and most useful model it has ever released. It showed cutting-edge performance in major benchmark tests for math, science, and coding, and with the ability to answer “I don’t know,” the occurrence of hallucinations—producing false information or content—has been significantly reduced. In addition, GPT-5 provides different answers each time the same question is repeated, and includes a feature that allows users to directly set the reasoning level and response length. Its natural sentence construction, creative expression, writing skills, and coding abilities have also been greatly improved compared to GPT-4. At a pre-briefing, GPT-5 was demonstrated building an application. When asked to “develop an app, including an educational game, that helps English speakers easily learn French,” it completed in a short time what would normally take a software developer several hours. GPT-5 is available to all users, but free users can only use it within a certain limit. Paid customers will see no change in pricing; Plus subscribers can enjoy higher usage and an enhanced version, while Pro subscribers can use it without limits. Source : "AI, 대학생서 박사 됐다…오픈AI 'GPT-5' 모델 공개", THE ELECTRONIC TIMES, 2025.08.08.
-
- 작성일 2025-08-11
- 조회수 908
-
- Case Studies on U.S. Universities’ Use of ChatGPT
- [Case Studies on U.S. Universities’ Use of ChatGPT] The Korean Council for University Education’s Higher Education Research Institute has published a research report titled “Case Study Analysis of U.S. Universities' Use of ChatGPT” as part of its 2024 Higher Education Issues Analysis Report. The report highlights growing concerns among universities regarding the unregulated use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, particularly the risk of academic plagiarism as students increasingly rely on the technology to complete assignments. In response, many institutions have developed guidelines and provided education on how to use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly. The study also explores how U.S. universities perceive ChatGPT and outlines various approaches they have taken to incorporate the tool into academic settings, offering insights into both the challenges and opportunities posed by AI in higher education. 1. Current Status of ChatGPT Use a. According to a 2024 study by Wang, Dang, Wu, and Mac analyzing prior research on AI in higher education, a survey of the top 100 universities in the United States revealed that 67.4% have implemented policies and guidelines on the use of generative AI tools specifically for faculty and instructors. Meanwhile, 17.8% have developed such guidelines targeting students. In contrast, only 14.7% of institutions have issued AI usage policies that apply broadly to the entire university community, without designating specific groups. b. The survey also found that 62.5% of respondents explicitly included policies and regulations regarding the use and potential misuse of generative AI in their course syllabi templates or examples. c. The study also provided an overview of how universities perceive and approach the use of generative AI, revealing several key insights. First, while most institutions remain cautious, they are not closed off to the use of generative AI; instead, they are adopting open and constructive attitudes by offering clear guidelines. Second, these guidelines often address ethical concerns such as plagiarism, as well as the limitations of using AI tools in educational settings. Third, 54.8% of the universities surveyed encourage faculty members to develop their own policies and instructions tailored to the specific context of their courses. Lastly, many U.S. universities are actively facilitating discussions on AI use through workshops, group seminars, and even one-on-one consultations with educators. d. In 2024, UNESCO released a “Quick Start Guide” on the use of generative AI. The guide outlines key considerations and recommendations for integrating AI tools into educational settings. The main contents of the guide are summarized in the figure below. 2. Case Studies from U.S. Universities on ChatGPT a. Arizona State University (ASU) Arizona State University (ASU) has launched an “AI Innovation Challenge,” prompting faculty and staff to propose a wide range of innovative ideas involving artificial intelligence. Within its dedicated Artificial Intelligence unit, the AI Acceleration Team plays a key role in ensuring the successful integration of AI platforms. This team is responsible for initiatives related to leadership, program and instructional design, data science, AI development, and data architecture and enhancement. ASU currently offers several courses that actively incorporate generative AI, including writing skills development using AI tools, multimedia storytelling through AI platforms, and AI prompt engineering. The university is also exploring the use of personalized tutoring chatbots designed to support student learning. In addition, ASU provides access to ChatGPT Enterprise and encourages the use of ChatGPT Edu, which was officially launched in June 2024. b. Stanford University In 2025, Stanford University released a report titled “Report Outlines Stanford Principles for Use of AI,” offering guidance on how artificial intelligence can be used responsibly across education, research, and administration. The report emphasizes ethical and thoughtful integration of AI technologies and introduces educational initiatives like the AI for Social Good program, which teaches students to apply cutting-edge AI tools to real-world challenges in healthcare, government, and environmental conservation. The report also addresses potential concerns such as plagiarism and academic integrity in the use of ChatGPT. Stanford’s IT department has also developed a curriculum to educate students on effective and ethical use of ChatGPT. The program covers technical foundations of the tool, prompt engineering techniques, and a wide range of practical use cases. A full summary of the research report is available at the link below. Source : "챗GPT 사용에 대한 미국 대학의 사례 분석?", 대학지성 In&Out, 2025.03.29.
-
- 작성일 2025-06-20
- 조회수 1176
-
- What Are Schools Learning in the Age of ChatGPT?
- [What Are Schools Learning in the Age of ChatGPT?] In November 2022, OpenAI released the conversational artificial intelligence ChatGPT, which surpassed 100 million monthly users within just two months of its launch. Since then, generative AI technology has had an immediate impact on the education sector. As we approach the third anniversary of its release, the influence of advanced AI on education has become apparent across many countries. In the early stages, the United States experienced confusion over how to incorporate ChatGPT into the classroom. Educators and school authorities struggled to adapt to the new technology, and policy makers failed to offer clear guidance. In Europe, Italy temporarily blocked access to ChatGPT in March 2023 as a precaution. Meanwhile, Asian countries have been observing the global AI trends while evaluating their own linguistic compatibility and formulating appropriate responses. International organizations such as UNESCO have also prioritized discussions on the educational applications of generative AI. This image was generated by ChatGPT based on the content of a news article. According to a 2024 report by the Pew Research Center, 26% of American teenagers reported using ChatGPT for school assignments, up from 13% in 2023, effectively doubling in one year. However, a survey of U.S. public school teachers showed that 25% viewed AI as harmful to education, while only 6% responded positively. The remaining respondents were either undecided or saw both pros and cons. In May 2023, a global survey conducted by UNESCO across over 450 educational institutions revealed that fewer than 10% had established any formal policies or guidelines for AI use. In higher education, surveys indicate that approximately 90% of college students have used ChatGPT to complete assignments, prompting concerns about academic dishonesty, including plagiarism. As a result, some universities have introduced alternative assessment methods such as handwritten exams and oral evaluations. The New York City Department of Education has launched AI training programs for teachers and is incorporating AI literacy into the official curriculum. While AI offers the benefit of expanding learning opportunities for students with limited educational resources, it may also widen the digital divide for students in regions with poor technology access. In response, experts stress the importance of developing AI literacy among students and educators alike. Ultimately, the education sector must take an active role in determining how AI is used and what values guide its application—focusing not just on how fast technology advances, but on the direction it takes. Source : "챗GPT 이후, 학교는 지금 무엇을 배우고 있나?", Edumorning, 2025.05.13.
-
- 작성일 2025-06-13
- 조회수 1078
-
- Comparing Human and AI Debate Skills: "GPT-4 Is More Persuasive", Swiss Research Team Warns: “AI Can Use Personal Data t
- [Comparing Human and AI Debate Skills: "GPT-4 Is More Persuasive" - Swiss Research Team Warns: “AI Can Use Personal Data to Make Customized Arguments – Risk of Misuse Must Be Addressed”] On May 20, researchers from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) announced that in an online debate experiment, GPT-4 was about 64% more persuasive than humans when it was given personal information such as gender, race, and education level. This image was generated by ChatGPT based on the content of a news article. YONHAP NEWS AGENCY. The team conducted a survey with 900 participants in the United States, collecting personal details like gender, age, and ethnicity. Participants were then randomly paired on an online platform, either in a human-to-human debate or a human-to-GPT-4 debate, and asked to argue about social and political issues. To measure persuasiveness, the researchers looked at how much a person’s opinion changed after the debate. In some cases, only one side received personal information about the other, to test how that data affected the outcome. The main result: when GPT-4 had access to the other person’s personal information, it gave arguments that were 64.4% more persuasive. Also, the chance that a human agreed with GPT-4's argument was 81.2%. However, when GPT-4 did not receive personal information, its persuasiveness was similar to that of a human. The research team concluded that GPT-4 can easily create customized arguments using just a small amount of personal data, and warned that this could be dangerous. They said AI might be used to spread false or manipulative arguments, and that further study and proper safeguards are needed. Source : "사람-AI 토론 능력 비교해보니…"GPT-4가 더 설득력 있어" , YONHAP NEWS AGENCY. 2025.05.20.
-
- 작성일 2025-05-21
- 조회수 1496
-
- OpenAI Updates Guide for ChatGPT Business Models – Highlights Best Uses for Each Model
- OpenAI Updates Guide for ChatGPT Business Models – Highlights Best Uses for Each Model OpenAI recently updated its guide for business users of ChatGPT, clearly explaining the features and best use cases of each available model. The updated guide introduces six models available to ChatGPT Enterprise subscribers: GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, o4-mini, o4-mini-high, o3, and o1 Pro Mode. The main model, GPT-4o, is a powerful multimodal model that supports search, image creation, voice input, and data analysis. It is suitable for everyday tasks. GPT-4.5 is good for creative tasks like writing emotional emails or product descriptions, but it has a weekly usage limit. For technical tasks, o4-mini and o4-mini-high are recommended. o4-mini is fast and works well for programming and STEM-related questions. o4-mini-high is better for solving complex math problems or explaining scientific ideas. The o3 model is useful for complex, multi-step tasks like strategic planning or market research. For tasks that need very accurate analysis or long-term predictions, the o1 Pro Mode is the best choice. OpenAI emphasized that to get the most value from ChatGPT, companies should understand the strengths of each model and combine them according to their needs. Source : "오픈AI, 기업용 GPT 모델 가이드 발표…최적의 선택은 무엇?" , DigitalToday. 2025.05.06.
-
- 작성일 2025-05-09
- 조회수 1509
-
- Returning Students Lament the Rise of ChatGPT Note-Taking… A Campus Transformed by AI
- [Returning Students Lament the Rise of ChatGPT Note-Taking… A Campus Transformed by AI] With the spread of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, university students are actively using AI for a variety of academic tasks—including writing reports, summarizing lectures, and conducting research—significantly changing the landscape of learning on campus. Students are sharing methods among themselves for capturing lecture materials and using ChatGPT to summarize them or quickly complete assignments with the help of GPT. Professors are gradually adapting to this trend as well—for example, Professor B from the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication at a national university has even permitted unrestricted use of AI in class. In the professional world, there is a growing preference for students who are proficient in using AI. Since the quality of assignments can differ even with the same tool, the ability to use ChatGPT effectively is increasingly regarded as a competitive edge. Source: "오픈AI, 기업용 GPT 모델 가이드 발표…최적의 선택은 무엇?", 디지털투데이 (DigitalToday), 2025.05.06.
-
- 작성일 2025-04-24
- 조회수 1455
-
- AI Detection Tools Are Not the Answer to Cheating in Classrooms – A New Way of Assessment Is Needed
- [AI Detection Tools Are Not the Answer to Cheating in Classrooms – A New Way of Assessment Is Needed] With the rapid development of AI (Artificial Intelligence), schools are also trying to use AI in many ways. One common method is using AI detection software to stop cheating. However, recent research and teachers say this technology is not always reliable or effective. AI detection tools usually analyze something called “perplexity” and “burstiness” to decide if a sentence was written by AI. But this method is not perfect. It can be unfair to students who are still learning English. Sometimes, the tool can even say a human wrote text with AI, which is called a “false positive.” For example, Turnitin’s AI detector says it is 99% accurate. But even a 1% false positive rate can be a big problem. At the University of Winnipeg in Canada, students submit around 250,000 assignments every year. If 1% are marked wrongly, that’s about 2,500 false cheating cases. According to a survey by the Center for Democracy and Technology, 68% of public school teachers in the U.S. (K–12 level) said they use AI detection tools. Some schools in Canada are also doing the same. But relying too much on AI detection can cause stress for both students and teachers. It also does not solve deeper problems with how schools test and grade students. Professor Michael Holden from the University of Winnipeg said that many assignments are now done at home, without a teacher watching. In this case, it's hard to know if the student really did the work themselves. He said we need to change how we assess students, instead of just making AI detectors stronger. Experts suggest using a type of grading called "formative assessment," which looks at the whole learning process — like drafts, progress, and feedback. They also say it’s important for students to take part in class and work on real projects where they solve problems by themselves. Professor Holden said, "In the age of AI, education needs to change how we evaluate students. We must understand what students truly know and what skills they really have. That means moving to new ways of assessment that focus more on the learning process and students' abilities." Source. : "[인공지능 줌인] AI 감지 소프트웨어, 교실 부정행위 해결책 아니다… 평가 방식 전환 필요", WIKI KOREA, 2025. 3. 6.
-
- 작성일 2025-04-17
- 조회수 1392