About us
1. Curriculum Innovation Committee
a. Committee Qualifications: Composed of professors and industry personnel with experience related to curriculum development and innovation
(curriculum responsible professors, industry personnel, education policy experts).
b. Number of Members: At least 5 members (according to university regulations)
(to ensure a balanced composition of internal faculty and external experts to enhance the efficiency of curriculum improvement.)
c. Operational Record: Hold regular meetings at least once a year and convene irregularly as needed.
d. Meeting Format: A mix of online and offline meetings.
e. Main Agenda Items:
- Discussion on reflecting contemporary demands in the curriculum and introducing innovative teaching methods.
- Improvement of the curriculum to meet industry needs and enhance field relevance.
- Review of educational programs reflecting the latest technologies and trends.
f. Operational Outcomes:
- Curriculum Reform : Introduction of a practical, industry-linked curriculum and strengthening of field practice and project-based learning.
- Development of Educational Innovation Programs : Establishment of new educational programs incorporating digital technologies and the latest teaching techniques.
- Strengthening Industry Linkage Programs : Development and operation of field-customized curricula through cooperation with companies, and expansion of industry internships.
- Improvement of Student Satisfaction : Increased positive evaluations in student satisfaction surveys following curriculum innovation, leading to qualitative improvements in education.
- Integration of Extracurricular Programs : Development of innovative learning models integrating learning and practice through connections with extracurricular activities.
g. Role
- The Curriculum Innovation Committee continuously promotes curriculum reform and innovation aligned with rapidly changing industrial and technological environments, contributing to a balanced learning of practical skills and theory for students.
2. Global Expert Committee
a. Committee Qualifications: Composed of international experts and university professors with research experience.
b. Number of Members: At least 3 members (according to research institute regulations),
(consisting of PhD-level R&D personnel from global companies and professors from prestigious universities or research institutes.)
c. Operational Record: Hold regular meetings at least once a year and convene irregularly as needed.
d. Meeting Format: Online or offline meetings.
e. Main Agenda Items
- Setting the direction for international collaboration and reflecting global research trends.
- Consultation on planning joint research and partnerships abroad.
- Establishing strategies to enhance the institute's global competitiveness.
f. Operational Outcomes
- Strengthening Global Cooperation : Identifying joint research projects with leading overseas universities and companies.
- Technical Consultation : Providing advice on the latest global research trends and technologies.
- Sharing Achievements : Promoting the institute's achievements internationally and disseminating them through a global network.
- Performance Evaluation : Evaluating the institute's international research achievements and suggesting improvement measures.
3. Performance Evaluation Committee
a. Committee Qualifications: Composed of academic experts with expertise in evaluating research performance.
b. Number of Members: At least 5 members (constituted according to research institute regulations).
c. Operational Record: Hold regular meetings at least once a year and convene irregularly as needed.
d. Meeting Format: Online or offline meetings.
e. Main Agenda Items
- Evaluation of the performance of the institute and industry-academia collaboration projects.
- Setting criteria and indicators for research performance evaluation.
- Discussion on improvement and supplementation of research based on evaluation results.
Operational Outcomes
- Development and Improvement of Performance Indicators : Discussion on developing performance evaluation indicators tailored to the institute's characteristics.
- Improvement and Feedback on Performance : Providing improvement measures for insufficient research performance based on evaluation results and specific feedback on future research directions.
- Performance Rewards and Incentives : Offering incentives and expanding research support to researchers who achieve outstanding results, maximizing motivation for research within the institute.
- Qualitative Improvement of Research Performance : Enhancing the qualitative level of research within the institute based on evaluation results and contributing to the establishment of strategies to maximize research outcomes in the medium to long term.
g. Role
- The Performance Evaluation Committee fairly and systematically evaluates the research performance within the institute, facilitating qualitative growth in research and rewarding excellent research outcomes.
4. Industry-Academia Collaboration Strategy Committee
a. Committee Qualifications: Composed of professors and industry experts with experience and capabilities in industry-academia collaboration.
b. Number of Members: At least 5 members (according to research institute and industry-academia collaboration office regulations).
c. Operational Record: Hold regular meetings at least once a year and convene irregularly as needed.
d. Meeting Format: Online or offline meetings.
e. Main Agenda Items
- Discussion on establishing and enhancing industry-academia collaboration strategies.
- Identifying and promoting research projects linked to corporate needs.
- Efficient management of industry-academia collaboration outcomes and establishing a system for sharing results.
- Strengthening cooperation networks between the institute and industry and creating opportunities for joint research.
f. Operational Outcomes
- Establishment of Industry Project Collaboration Strategies : Development of practical industry project collaboration strategies tailored to corporate demands, resulting in an increase in successful collaboration projects.
- Identification of Industry Project Linked Projects : Discovery and promotion of research projects reflecting field needs through continuous discussions with companies, actively participating in joint research and technology development.
- Sharing and Dissemination of Outcomes : Sharing the results of industry project collaboration projects through the collaboration network and creating additional cooperation opportunities based on outcomes.
g. Role
- The Industry Project Collaboration Strategy Committee plays a crucial role in establishing practical and specific strategies to strengthen cooperation between industries and the research institute, maximizing collaboration outcomes and building sustainable partnerships.
5. Industry Project Collaboration Outcomes Committee
a. Committee Qualifications: Composed of professors and industry experts with expertise in industry-academia collaboration.
b. Number of Members: At least 5 members (according to research institute regulations),
(ensuring a balanced representation of internal and external personnel to enhance the committee's independence and expertise.)
c. Operational Record: Hold regular meetings at least once a year and convene irregularly as needed.
d. Meeting Format: Online or offline meetings.
e. Main Agenda Items
- Analysis and evaluation of the outcomes of industry-academia collaboration projects.
- Setting future research directions based on collaboration outcomes with industry.
- Discussion on qualitative and quantitative goals for industry-academia collaboration projects and plans for achieving them.
- Activation of joint research with companies and examination of the commercialization potential of research outcomes.
f. Operational Outcomes
- mprovement in the Success Rate of Industry Project Collaboration Projects : Achieving tangible outcomes through joint research between the institute and industry.
- Customized R&D for Companies : Selection of research and development projects reflecting industry demand, establishing a continuous network with companies.
- Establishment of a Performance Evaluation System : Creating a system to objectively evaluate industry-academia collaboration outcomes.
